Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
PIER 70 . san francisco, california
  • concept vision plan
2
sponsors
  • Il Fornaio
  • Fog City Diner
  • SpringLoaf Catering
  • Enterprise Rent-A-Car
  • Bauer’s Limousine
  • zD Precision Models
  • ESRI
  • Autodesk
  • Google Earth
  • Dell
  • @Last (sketchUP)
  • Norcal Waste Systems, Inc
  • Ruby Sailing
  • Goat Hill Pizza
  • The Ramp Restaurant & Bar
  • Moshi Moshi Sushi Bar
  • City Kayak
  • Kayak Unlimited
  • Bay Access
  • The Bike Hut
  • Sandy D’Elia
  • SF Bicycle  Coalition
  • Vasquez Coffee
  • DJ Adnan
  • Mia & Jonah


3
steering committee
  • Thank you


  • Jesse Blout, Mayor’s Office of Economic Development and Workforce
  • Greg Asay, Board of Supervisors
  • Monique Moyer, Port of SF
  • Byron Rhett, Port of SF
  • Lynda Swanson, Port of SF
  • David Beaupre, Port of SF
  • Dean Macris, SF Planning Dept
  • Amit Ghosh, SF Planning Dept
  • Jim Chappell, SPUR
  • Will Travis, BCDC
  • Brad McCrea, BCDC
  • Ira Maxbaum, San Francisco Drydock, Inc
  • Toby Levine, Central Waterfront Advisory Group
  • John Borg, Central Waterfront Advisory Group
  • Charles Chase, SF Architectural Heritage
  • Lynn Cullivan, National Park Maritime Museum
  • Judy deReus, UCSF Mission Bay Campus
  • Isabel Wade, Neighborhood Parks Council
  • Jeff Condit, Neighborhood Parks Council
  • Terezia Nemeth, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc
  • Amy Naches, SF Redevelopment Agency
  • Edward Hatter, Potrero Hill Neighborhood House
  • Joe Boss, Dogpatch Neighborhood Association
  • Paul Nixon, Bay Access and the SF Bicycle Coalition
  • Ralph Wilson, Potrero Hill Boosters



4
EDAW professional intern program
  • 1980 Poudre River Canyon, Colorado
  • 1981 Estes Park, Colorado
  • 1982 Greeley, Colorado
  • 1983 Fort Collins, Colorado
  • 1984 Fort Collins, Colorado
  • 1985 Alexandria, Virginia
  • 1986 San Francisco, California
  • 1987 Aurora, Colorado
  • 1988 Washington, DC
  • 1989 San Francisco, California
  • 1990 Alexandria, Virginia
  •               Atlanta, Georgia
  • 1993 Seattle, Washington
  •               Rocky Mountain Nat’l Park & the Town of Estes, Colorado
  •               San Francisco, California
  • 1996 * International Planning Workshop– Suzhou, China
  •                       Wilkes Barre, Pennsylvania
  • 1997 Irvine, California
  • 1998 Petra, Jordan
  • 1999 Miami Beach, Florida
  • 2000 Steigerwald Lake, Washington
  • 2001 Denver, Colorado
  • 2002 Miami, Florida
  • 2003 Beijing, China
  •               Nassau, The Bahamas
  •   San Francisco, California


5
25th EIP anniversary
celebration
June 5, 2005
6
EDAW professional intern program
7
EDAW interns - 2005

  • Sam Baucum, Louisiana State University
  • Mara Baum, University of California at Berkeley
  • Phyllis Boyd, University of Texas at Austin
  • Katie Dixon, University of Sheffield
  • Patricia Fonseca, University of California at Berkeley
  • Yvonne Hung, Harvard University GSD
  • Young min Kim, Harvard University GSD
  • James Lounsbury (Bart), Harvard University
  • Stephen Mainzer, The Pennsylvania State University
  • Yan Mei (May), University Of Massachusetts at Amherst
  • Jenifer Naas, University of Washington
  • Vipin Nambiar, University of Texas at Austin
  • Brooke Marie Raila, University of Pennsylvania
  • Olivia Saw, Harvard University GSD
  • Ka Ki Sin, University of Hong Kong
  • Jianqiao Tan (Dora), Columbia University
  • Grace Tang, University of Toronto
  • Tonia Wall, University of California at Berkeley
  • Yan Wang, Texas A&M University
  • Ritesh Warade, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Anne Zaragoza, School of Landscape Arch of Versailles





8
we listened to the community
  • community outreach


9
we listened to the community
  • steering committee visions


10
we incorporated
urban environmental accords
11
site
12
building the vision . design principles
  • character


13
building the vision . design principles
14
building the vision . design principles
15
vision
  • Pier 70 will be a diverse working waterfront district that embraces its distinctive arts and industrial character, connects to the local communities, reveals its maritime history and activates the water’s edge.


  • This will be achieved with a flexible framework that facilitates the discovery of this unique experiential landscape.
16
wave of SF port redevelopment
17
westcoast
drydocks
18
cruiseship
terminals
19
land use
20
land use
21
current site uses
22
public trust lands assumptions
23
regional circulation
24
local circulation
25
adjacent neighborhoods
26
view corridors
27
figure ground
28
topography
29
noise and light
30
environmental considerations
31
historical traces
32
the zipper
33
framework diagram
34
illustrative Plan
35
proposed land use & program
36
crane point park
  • welcome . discovery . nature . interaction . sensory
37
crane point park
38
crane point park
39
powerhouse court
  • welcome . discovery . nature . interaction . sensory
40
20th st corridor
  • vista . voyeuristic . narrative . historic traces . arts
41
20th street
42
20th st corridor
  • vista . voyeuristic . narrative . historic traces . arts
43
20th street view towards the drydock
44
shipyard square
45
shipyard square
46
shipyard square
47
machine shop court . irish hill alley
  • vista . voyeuristic . narrative . historic traces . arts
48
machine shop court . irish hill alley
49
irish hill alley view
50
machine shop court market view
51
machine shop court market view
52
view through buildings in the historic district
53
noonan arts district
54
noonan arts district
55
noonan arts district
56
noonan arts district
57
pier 70 marina
58
pier 70 marina
59
traversing the site
60
section a . through 20th street
61
section b . through noonan arts district
62
section b . residential & irish hill
63
section c . through machine shop courtyard
64
section d . through waterfront
65
illustrative plan
66
landscape strategy
67
building strategy
68
site circulation
69
parking strategy
70
implementation strategy


  • First steps


  • Interim uses


  • Partnerships with shared values
71
first steps
  • Crane point park


  • Hotel and restaurants along waterfront
72
interim uses and steps
  • Parking for commuters and stadium



  • Aesthetic cleanup of historic facades



  • Artists exhibition space
73
partnerships with shared values
74
partnerships with shared values
  • Access to water
  • Recreational waterfront
  • Active working waterfront
  • Pedestrian-friendly streets and spaces
  • Historic character
  • Better access
  • Artistic community
  • Environmental sustainability
75
Partnerships with shared values
76
financial summary
77
financial summary




  • Mix of Projects: some are profitable and some need subsidies.



  • Attracts private sector to invest in new construction & historic district




78
financial summary
  • funding sources


79
financial summary
  • funding sources


  • Other financing resources, grants, and loans targeting historical preservation, portfields, brownfields, and parks from entities such as:


    • EPA
    • NOAA
    • EDA
    • Dept of Commerce
    • USDA
    • Maritime Adminsitration
    • Dept of Transportation
    • HUD
    • Dept of Interiors
    • National Trust for Historical Preservation




80
phasing strategy
81
existing
82
phase 0
83
phase 1
84
phase 2
85
phase 3
86
phase 3
87
phase 4
88
phase 5
89
phase 6
90
phase 7
91
phase 8
92
EDAW intern program 2005